Dani
Fiumicelli - Technical Director
It is often perceived that the
control of noise nuisance is an issue which sits outside the normal planning
process. However, when considering new
development (either noise generating or sensitive to noise) nuisance needs to
be actively considered particularly as legal precedent means that there is no
legal defence of claiming the noisy land use was there first. Therefore, the potential
to cause noise nuisance by emitting noise or bringing receptors to an existing
noise source are legitimate grounds to refuse planning permission. In turn it follows that it is in the
interests of developers of both noise generating and noise sensitive
development to identify and minimise any risks to their schemes due to noise
nuisance.
There is general agreement that nuisance
is incapable of an exact quantified definition.
But this flexibility is a key strength for the legislation, as the core
principles of nuisance can be applied to almost any situation. This enables a
single legal concept and simple short legislative measures to apply to a wide
range of situations and to be ready to tackle unforeseen and unforeseeable
problems.
Subjectivity
The negative side of nuisance is
that there is no clearly defined means of measuring it. It is often said to be
subjective and those accused of nuisance can feel aggrieved that they have no
clearly defined simple benchmark, like a speed limit, that can be used to
avoid being subject to legal action or having permission for a development
withheld. But in fact, whilst nuisance can be assessed qualitatively, it is
an objective standard e.g. it only protects the ordinary reasonable use of land
and those of normal sensitivity; it reflects the nature and character of a
particular locality and minor infractions cannot be a nuisance. In presenting a
nuisance case to a court, defending accusations of nuisance or appraising the
risk that nuisance might arise, there is therefore a role for quantified measurable
evidence. For example, to support the argument that the noise was likely to be
having an effect that the ordinary person would find hard to tolerate; or,
going the other way, to demonstrate that the noise was unlikely to have been
intolerable to an ordinary person.
Noise sensitive receptors and
future occupiers
As well as considering noise
nuisance, planning policy means that developers of noise generating and noise
sensitive development need to consider the impacts of noise from their scheme
on the quality of life and health of existing noise sensitive receptors; and
the impact of existing noise sources on the quality of life and health of
future occupiers of their schemes. The
standard here is different to nuisance; and normally the standards applied for
planning purposes will avoid nuisance. Analogous to nuisance, current noise and
planning policy doesn’t provide any detailed decibel based noise limits;
instead qualitatively defined concepts such as Lowest Observed Adverse Effect
Level and Significant Observed Adverse Effect Level apply. The means the
practitioner has to carefully select and justify the guidelines and noise
limits they use to assess a scheme on case by case basis.
Practical advice to resolve noise
nuisance risks
Temple has a long history of
dealing with noise nuisances including being technical advisers to the
Government on nuisance policy and advising many local authorities and those
accused of being responsible for nuisance in individual cases. Temple also has
a comprehensive track record of advising developers on noise generating and
noise sensitive development in order to secure planning permission or
parliamentary approval of a scheme. This all puts Temple at the forefront when
it comes to the translation of legislation and policy into clear and concise
practical guidance and advice aimed at identifying ad minimising noise risks
to a scheme.
For more information on Temple's Acoustics services, please contact Dani Fiumicelli at dani.fiumicelli@templegroup.co.uk, alternatively contact Simon Perry at simon.perry@templegroup.co.uk.
No comments:
Post a Comment