Erica Ward - Senior Consultant
Would
you invest in a company based on unaudited accounts? When a company publishes
its financial accounts we expect these accounts to have been fully audited and
assured for accuracy. We need to have the confidence in that company and its
performance. We are accordingly shocked when companies and their financial auditors
get it wrong, and investments take a tumble, as recently happened when with a
major UK retailer.
So why is
environmental data any different? According to research commissioned by the
Global Reporting Initiative and Accounting for Sustainability the majority of
investors and analysts (77%) rate external assurance of ‘extra-financial’
reporting as very important or important[1].
Verification
of environmental data, however, is still very much a minority activity. In
2013, fewer than 40% of UK FTSE 350 companies independently verified their organisational
carbon footprint[2].
This is startling given that this group of companies should be leading the
environmental disclosure agenda.
When
comparing the risks of investment in otherwise similar companies, having verified
data may make all the difference to an investor, and in time could have an
effect on stock prices. Greater disclosure and particularly verified disclosure
by environmental professionals only goes to help investors make the decision to
invest. Whilst environmental reporting is still evolving, it is no longer an
excuse when it comes to carbon; the general consensus on approach to
undertaking a carbon footprint coupled with international standards (e.g. ISO
14064) enable us to compare organisations directly if their reporting
mechanisms comply and are verified. In a similar way, waste and water reporting
have also become more standardised.
Now that
carbon and other environmental reporting have grown up as it were, the benefits
of verification are clear. It means internal decisions-makers can take long
term environmental risks into account and be confident that they are responding
to the most important risks for their business. Today’s increasingly sceptical
investors will also have the assurance that disclosures of environmental data can
be confidently relied on when they analyse the impact on value creation and
risk. Verification of emissions reductions and other improvements help create certainty
regarding progress against targets, whether they are for an organisation or an
individual project.
We’d be
interested to hear your views and experiences of non-financial verification; if
you’d like to get in touch please contact Martin Gibson on
0207 394 3700.
[2]
Figure based on 52% of the 260 FTSE
350 companies that disclosed under CDP, from: Carbon
Disclosure Project, 2013, Are UK
companies prepared for the international impacts of climate change?
For a local company dealing with global risks is the same as for a small ship to be caught in a thunderstorm. The only way to make through is to have a guidance. At YADO, we believe that no local company should be left alone in the darkness of the global business and trading risks. Our mission is to help local business to grow globally by verifying information and offering local support.
ReplyDelete